Judge Judy Destroys eBay Scammer lol

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by dickson, Feb 5, 2011.

  1. dickson

    dickson Well-Known Member

    557
    70
    0
    [youtube]qp6M5l0FmEg[/youtube]

    lol'ed at fat white bitch
     
  2. MrCooperS

    MrCooperS Well-Known Member

    424
    53
    0
    LMAO winner for $5000.

    But it's seriously so easy to scam on eBay.
     
  3. Jeff

    Jeff 神之馬壯

    8,067
    606
    558
    Surprisingly i watched the whole thing.

    But she did get destroyedd..
     
  4. person

    person Well-Known Member

    Lol bitched got owned... photo only... jeez.
     
  5. asiankidremix

    asiankidremix Well-Known Member

    160
    41
    1
    lol this is an old case about 5 to 6 years ago and yes the fat chick did get destroy by judy.
     
  6. ralphrepo

    ralphrepo Well-Known Member

    5,274
    459
    249
    The defendant is an idiot. She should get her ass kicked and she belongs in jail.

    That aside, Judge Judy should be ashamed in calling herself a judge. In this case, she fails to publicly and properly address the defendant's rationale, of "a photo only" and why it should not be considered an adequate defense against a charge of fraud. She did lightly broach the topic by detailing the ad's product description character (which talked about the weight of the phone) but she never discussed why that would legally support a charge of fraud, and why the "a photo only" clause in the ad is not considered adequate legal defense. Instead, she tangentially veered into the arena of bad parenting and began name calling that lowered her to the level of the defendant. First and foremost, a jurist is to remain impartial; even if a judge personally finds a defendant's behavior abhorrent, they must at least maintain a deportment supportive of justices' blindness concept of cases before the court.

    In this regard, she failed miserably. Of course, I do realize that this is only television. But, the fact remains, the sensationalism or what makes Judy so attractive to audiences, is exactly that which would cause cases to be retried (for breaches of impartiality). It's no wonder Judy is retired from the bench.
     
  7. Yo this is maddd old... saw this long time ago.. I remember I had a Judge Judy youtube phase.. lol

    what a dumb ass.. $400 for a picture, she must think she's clever to think of that. I wonder how paypal handled the situation..

    anyways.. you wanna watch some funny ass judge judy look up 'rocket science'

    wait I just remembered.. I posted Judge Judy Ps3 video while ago.. hahah
     
  8. saw this a long time ago as well.... but yeah.... scam artist.....
     
  9. Knoctur_nal

    Knoctur_nal |Force 10 from Navarone|

    16,563
    662
    29
    Judge Judy=Jerry Springer in Court.
     
  10. Bulla

    Bulla Well-Known Member

    1,447
    61
    0
    If Jerry was the judge the security guard would have to fight someone.
     
  11. but theyre so bad at it, they shouldn't even be labeled artist. More like scam scrubs.. scam retards.. $400 for a picture.. bitch you trippin..
     
  12. Well it clearly states its Photo-Only.

    Use a heavier paper lady!
     
  13. ralphrepo

    ralphrepo Well-Known Member

    5,274
    459
    249
    Disclaimer defense (especially when rendered in fine print where the bulk of the advertising boldly suggests something else*), have been shown to provide very little legal umbrage from charges of fraud. In this case, the ad obviously remains highly suggestive of cell phones being offered for sale. It is the classic bait and switch method of enticement selling, which is considered illegal in just about all states within the US.

    * In this case, Stub Antenna, Clamshell design, Battery Power etc., mentioned in the ad but barely or not even discussed by Judy.
     
    #13 ralphrepo, Feb 8, 2011
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2011
  14. negiqboyz

    negiqboyz Well-Known Member

    all for television .. i am sure that's not how judge judy would act in reality whilst on the bench cuz she can be easily kicked off if she does that off the set.

    $400 for the photos .. very stupid defense.