why bother wasting the money for buying film, change it and miss the great opportunities and can't check photos until you print them...
Same reason why people still like to read a real book or rebuild classic cards. Some people actually appreciate the fact that you have to take the time to compose the perfect shot.
Here we go again...shot was taken in London, with 5D MK I + 24-70mm f2.8L And here one with the 50mm f1.4
really you like gentle comments? i always prefer bad & harsh comments; that's the only way to be better and learn...i really hate how ppl generally say oh that's a good photo etc thos are some more expensive lens there i see
The Shard by Chee.lam, on Flickr The Shard, West Europes highest building in London. Taken with 5D + 17-40mm f4 on a wobbly bridge.
London Panorama Nightshot by Chee.lam, on Flickr Kyoto Garden by Chee.lam, on Flickr London, Pavilion by Chee.lam, on Flickr London, Bridges by Chee.lam, on Flickr
Nope, it has been post processed in Lightroom but not by much. Only contrast, Lights and tiny bit of sharpness. The Blurr Effect results from the Lee ND 1000 (Big Stopper) Filter. 50sec to take this image.
Well if you want to use software generated blurr, then there is no point to buy a £3k DSLR and lenses
not true, more expensive cameras are used for more commercial use and for its quality, with the software it will ENHANCE you can do with the photo
Never noticed a thread like this, and would like some comments. These were all shot with a Nikon D80 with 85mm 1.8 and edited with Lightroom only.
Nice pictures, I just don't like how the background is too blurry. Can't see where the gentleman is at.
